In this project we apply knowledge of the vorticity equation to the question of tornadogenesis. You will be given an article from the journal Nature that looks at long term variations in tornado numbers and poses a reason for the changes that depends on vorticity. This article elicited many interested responses. Based on your understanding of vorticity, you will be asked to assess both the original article and the published responses to this article.
The article this project centered on is:
Another article by Morton (1984) covers many basic examples of vorticity
generation and diffusion, from a classical fluid dynamics perspective. While
this may not seem too much like "real meteorology", these examples form the
building blocks of the types of flows we observe and forecast in the real
atmosphere and so can be extremely useful tools. I recommend that you use
this article as background for your thinking about the project:
PROJECT 1, Part A: Individual Written Critiques of Isaacs et al. (1975)
PROJECT 1, Part B: Group Discussion and Consensus Paper
I will assign you each to a discussion group when you arrive. In your groups (of 3-5 people) you will discuss the article and responses. You will form a group position. Each member of the group will write a summary of the group position and any points on which they dissent from the group (with justification) by the next discussion class.
It is quite possible that your group won't come to full agreement on this topic in the single class period provided. In order to complete this project properly, you will probably want to schedule some more discussion time out of class.
PROJECT 1, Part C: Class Discussion
When you arrive at the second discussion class, you will hand me your second piece of written work, describing your group's position and your own additional ideas. You must all be ready to defend these ideas. This will be a general class discussion, but I will call on individuals (hiding won't help!).
Approach to Project One
Essentially, approach this as if you were going to be publically reviewed by an audience of your peers (or, at least, folks more scary than we can drum up here at Penn State). This means that you have to:
As meteorologists, you will be expected to communicate information about the weather and climate constantly, and to a wide variety of people. Therefore, I will give no allowance for sloppy writing. I expect professional efforts here.
Summary of Deadlines:
Back to the
class homepage...
Last Updated: 3 September 1998